The Engineering Inspector – Work Piece Matching Algorithm for Setting up Minimum Cost Engineering Inspection Team

Wimalyn Bovenizer, Suchai Thanawastien, Krissada Maleewong, Suwannee Thoobjeen

Abstract


The Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) for materials and manufactured equipment purchased and destined for use in different industries as well as their assembly, fabrication, integration and commissioning as functioning entities such as Refineries, Power Plants, Nuclear facilities, Ships, Oil Rigs etc. is a highly complex, specialized and critical undertaking which unless performed to prescribed and controlled levels and extent can result in calamitous HSE consequences with danger to life, the environment as well as financial loss. This research describes the practices and planning required to effectively manage the QA/QC process in terms of finding the right engineering inspection team algorithmically; this is a new approach to securely deliver the cost-effective aspect of QA/QC. Cost being a fundamental and mandatory component of QA/QC business. This can be achieved by securing the key elements of the process which have to include; the selection of the inspection personnel, the identification of the required specifications and design parameters, the control of reporting, maintenance of data, contractual conditions and requirements as related to QA/QC, control of budget. Currently, often the control of these processes is compartmentalized and based on familiarity of personnel and fragmented systems. This dissertation proposes that the processes can be controlled systematically through the proposed algorithms. The algorithmic process will allow management to effectively form work groups that will control and deliver the work processes within budget satisfying the QA/QC requirements. Experiments were conducted to compare the results of using the manual procedures and the proposed WBS-EI Matching algorithm to find the inspectors for a set of work pieces (WBS) with minimum cost or budget. The algorithm produced results far superior to manual procedures. There are many variations of the matching algorithm proposed in this research providing a broader possibility to maximize the profit in many different situations.

Keywords- QA/QC; engineering inspection; matching algorithm; minimum cost


Full Text:

PDF

References


Muhammad Arsalan Farooq, Randolph Kirchain, Henriqueta

Novoa, Antonio Araujo, Cost of Quality: Evaluating Cost-Quality

Trade-Offs for Inspection Strategies of Manufacturing Processes,

International Journal of Production Economics 188 April 2017

Vijay Kumar, Role of Third-Party Agency In FPSO/FSO EPCIC

Project

Yoshua Neuman, Thaís da C. L. Alves, Kenneth D. Walsh, Kim

LaScola Needy and Rufaidah Y. Almaian ANALYSIS OF

SUPPLIER QUALITY SURVEILLANCE IN EPC PROJECTS,

June 2014

(https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/122a/566a913740cc2ede71ed820b0082d00f

e64.pdf)

Rufaidah AlMaian, A Strategic Approach to Effectively Manage

Supplier Quality within the Construction Industry University of

Arkansas, Fayetteville .2014

(https://scholarworks.uark.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://

www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=3673&context=etd)

Darrington, J., Dunne, D., & Lichtig, W. (2009). Organization,

Operating System, and Commercial Terms. Managing Integrated

Project Delivery. CMAA, McLean, Virginia,10-47.

Needy, K. & Ries R. (2010). Best practices in quality management

for the capital facilities delivery industry. Research Report No.

Research Report 254-11. The Construction Industry Institute: The

University of Texas at Austin.

Singer, A. J., Churchill, G. F., & Dale, B. G. (1989). Some supplier

quality assurance assessment issues. Quality & Reliability

Engineering International, 5(2), 101-111.

Ahmad, S. (2014). An analysis of process vs. inspection capability in

fabricated, engineered-to-order supply chains. M.S. Thesis, San

Diego State University, San Diego, CA.

Neuman, Y., Alves, T., Walsh, K., Needy, K., & Al Maian, R.

(2014). Analysis of supplier quality surveillance in EPC projects. 22nd

Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean

Construction–IGLC 22 – Oslo, Norway, 1083-1094.

Chase, G. (1993). Effective total quality management (TQM) process

for construction. Journal of Management in Engineering Special

issue: Total quality management in civil engineering, (9) 433–443.

Linn, R. J., Fugee, T., & Lau Wai Choi, E. (2006). Supplier selection

based on process capability and price analysis. Quality

Engineering, 18(2), 123-129.

Azambuja, M., & O’Brien, W. (2012). Rapid Assessment of

Engineered Equipment Supplier Automation in Construction, 22,

-596.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.