Identifying Technology Readiness Index Scale Under Internet Usage Context
Abstract
This article presents Confirmatory Factor Analysis for identifying proper variables to create a technology readiness index factor under the internet usage context. Two aims of this research are to explore technology readiness opinion and to identify factors of the technology readiness index. This research conduct by using modified sixteen standard questions from previous research. The analyze was done with descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation, and analytic statistics including exploratory factor analysis with the principal method and varimax rotation; Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Composite Reliability (CR), Alpha Cronbach Reliability Testing, Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The findings are firstly respondent have an opinion at agree level in motivator factor. There are three subjects that the respondent list in disagree such as technology is easy, depending on technology, and secure to use technology. The second finding is the EFA synthesis three-factor, but the AVE value tells that the 1st factor and 3rd factor are good to fit (the value > .5), the AVE value of 2nd factor is .39. Although not all AVE value is fit, the CR value of three factors are over .7, so that means all factor are able to use. When validating all three-factor with Alpha Cronbach testing, the value of three factors is over .7. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis show the fitted model with statistics such as c2 = 75.437, df. = 58, c2 /df = 1.301, p = .062, CFI = .979, and RMSEA = .039
Full Text:
PDFReferences
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading MA:Addison-Wesley, 1975.
F.D. Davis, R. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Manage. Sci., vol. 35, no. 8, pp.398-406, Aug. 1989.
A. Paru Parasuraman, “Technology Readiness Index(TRI): A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies,” Jour. of Serv. Res. vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 307-230, May 2000.
A Praruraman, C. L. Colby, “An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0,” Jour. of Serv. Res., vol. 18 no. 1, pp. 59 – 74, February 1, 2015.
C. L. Colby, and A. Parasuraman, “An Abbreviate Version of TRI 2.0.” Rockbridge - Strategic Market Research. https://rockresearch.com/abbreviated-version-tri-2-0/ (accessed feb 1, 2019).
K. Rangsom, and W. Khan-am, “Examine Behavioral Intention to Use Internet of Thing into TRAM”, International Journal of Applied Computer Technology and Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 2 pp. 67-71, 2018
K. Rangsom, and W. Khan-am, “An Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Developing TRI 2.0 Structured Model under Internet of Things Context”, International Journal of Applied Computer Technology and Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 1 pp. 46-49, 2019
W. Khan-am, and K. Rangsom, “Develop Indicator for Attribute of Rate of Adoption To AEC Entrance in Pathum thani Province”, RMUTT GLOBAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 73-85, 2016.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.